When you have an excellent product but zero distribution
And you depend on 2-3 distributors who decide your destiny
When you have an excellent product but zero distribution
And you depend on 2-3 distributors who decide your destiny
Do you recognize this situation?- You produce something objectively good, often better than the competition
- But your market access goes only through a few distributors
- If a distributor drops you, you lose 30-40% of revenue
- You have no direct relationship with those who actually use your product
- You'd like to grow but don't know how to reach new clients
The problem of distributive dependency
You know how to make your product very well.
You invest in quality, innovation, continuous improvement.
Your end clients, when they try it, are satisfied.
But between you and them there's a wall: the distributor.
And the distributor:
- Also handles your competitors
- Has no particular interest in pushing you more than others
- Decides which products to promote
- Controls prices and margins
- Keeps you away from the end client
You produce value, but someone else decides if and how to sell it.
What happens when distribution controls you
On the commercial front:- You can't choose final selling prices
- You can't do direct marketing
- You can't test new markets without going through them
- If a distributor drops you, it's an immediate crisis
- You don't receive direct feedback from users
- You don't know why some products sell and others don't
- Innovations are guided by suppositions, not data
- Improvement is slowed by distance from the market
- Your growth depends on others' decisions
- You have no negotiating leverage: either accept their conditions or don't sell
- Every attempt to bypass them creates conflicts
- You're vulnerable to their strategy changes
Why it happens
At first, relying on distributors was the simplest solution.
You didn't have to build a commercial network.
You didn't have to manage logistics.
They already had the clients, you just had to produce.
But over the years you became a prisoner of this choice.
You completely delegated commercialization.
You never developed direct sales skills.
You never built a brand recognizable by the end client.
And now that you'd like to change, you don't know where to start.
The (wrong) path many try
Apparent solution: Look for new distributors to diversify
But this doesn't solve the structural problem.
You go from being dependent on 2-3 distributors to being dependent on 5-6.
The power remains entirely on their side.
You still don't have direct market access.
The 5-step method:
-
Direct brand building
→ The end client must know you, not just the distributor
→ Content marketing, digital presence, sector authority -
Controlled parallel channels
→ E-commerce, direct sales to large accounts, specific partnerships
→ Not to replace distributors, but to have alternatives -
Relationship with end users
→ Collect feedback, create community, build loyalty
→ The distributor remains intermediary but not gatekeeper -
Price and margin strategy
→ You define value positioning
→ The distributor earns on distribution, not on your margin -
Geographic and sectoral diversification
→ New markets where you don't yet have established distributors
→ Different sales methods for different segments
What changes after
You're no longer hostage to distribution.
You have credible alternatives.
You have negotiating leverage.
You have direct market access when needed.
Distributors become strategic partners, not masters of your destiny.
And you can finally grow according to your vision, not theirs.
Do you recognize yourself in this situation?
Fill out the MAP (Preliminary Analysis Module) and receive a free consultation with an expert to analyze your specific situation and identify the most effective strategies.